Bbc

'Eyesore' Prince Philip statue in Cambridge removed after appeal

J.Martin31 min ago
An "eyesore" city centre statue representing Prince Philip has been removed.

The £150,000 Cambridge Don statue had stood at Hill Roads and commemorated the late prince's 35 years as chancellor of the University of Cambridge.

However, planners earlier this year told the owners and property firm Unex the four-metre (13ft) bronze figure breached planning regulations.

Unex disputed the fact it had needed planning permission , but the Planning Inspectorate sided with Cambridge City Council and dismissed Unex's appeal.

City councillor Katie Thornburrow previously described the statue, bearing a plaque naming the late Duke at its base, as "controversial".

"The figure, supposed to represent Prince Philip in his robes as vice-chancellor of Cambridge University with mortar board and tassel, is cast in bronze but painted black and white, with a twisted bronze abstract 'head'," she said on her website .

"It has been described as 'kitsch-like' and 'detritus masquerading as public art'," she added.

A spokesperson for Cambridge City Council said it welcomed the Planning Inspectorate's decision on 11 September.

"The statue was erected without planning permission and was in breach of planning control like anything erected without the correct permission," they added.

"Given its size and location in the New Town and Glisson Road conservation area it would have been unlikely to receive planning approval even if it had been sought because it would have contravened national and local planning policies."

Unex representatives had argued as the statue had never been fixed to the ground, it was just an object placed in the area and therefore did not require planning permission.

However in the Planning Inspectorate's decision , it stated "both the sculpture and plinth constitute acts of development and that the sculpture should not be granted planning permission".

However, as the plinth was below ground level, Unex was not required to remove it and was allowed to cover it with soil and grass seed.

The landowner had four months to return the land to its former condition, according to the council.

Unex has been approached for comment.

0 Comments
0